We go back a few months ago when the French newspaper Francesoir published on December 3 2020 the letter of Professor of Infectious Diseases Christian Perronne entitled “MRNA vaccine: a loud appeal from Professor Perronne” where he reproduces his open letter which he published on his personal Facebook account and for which on Sud Radio.
The first “vaccines” on offer are not vaccines, but products of gene therapy, says Professor Christian Perronne in his letter, noting that “vaccine makers are apprentice magicians and take the French and the people of the world in general for guinea pigs.”
Here we must recall the intervention of French President Emmanuel Macron, who raised many questions about the new vaccines and how he will not rush to adopt them, if he is not sure.
Letter from Prof. Perronne
France, which has been living a nightmare for months, is waking up.
In many cities of our beautiful country, the people are marching to regain their freedom, to demand the return of democracy.
As a doctor, specialist in infectious diseases and having been president of numerous public health bodies or councils, including on vaccines, I measure every day the uncertainties generating the fear and the growing disarray of our fellow citizens. I take the risk of being again qualified as a “conspirator” or better still as “reassuring”, terms designating those who criticize or challenge the single thought.
I end up being proud of these names, my words expressing the truth having never changed since the start of the epidemic. I therefore consider that it is my responsibility to express myself again today on the entire medical aspect of Covid-19 and in particular on the vaccine subject, now the central and almost unique element of the policy of state health.
Many French people have been mesmerized by the politics of fear. Since September 2020, we had been told of a second terrible wave of the epidemic, worse than the first. The Minister of Health, Dr Olivier Véran, the President of the Scientific Council of the Elysée, Prof. Jean François Delfraissy, the Director
General of Health, Professor Jérôme Salomon, the Institut Pasteur announced catastrophic figures with an exponential increase in the number of deaths. Hospitals had to be saturated and overwhelmed.
Even the President of the Republic, during a recent televised address announcing the reconfinement, predicted no less than 400,000 deaths, adding to the 200,000 deaths estimated shortly before by Professor Arnaud Fontanet de Pasteur. These unrealistic figures had only one goal, to fuel fear to keep us confined, wisely masked. However, the widespread use of masks in the general population has no scientifically demonstrated interest in stemming the SARS-COV-2 epidemic. The use of masks should be targeted for patients, their entourage (especially people at risk) and caregivers in contact.
But the epidemic is regressing and has not led to any apocalypse. The dynamics of the curve have shown for weeks the profile of a seasonal epidemic rebound that is observed with certain viruses, once the epidemic wave has ended.
This testifies to the adaptation of the virus to humans and is also a reflection of the collective immunity which progresses in the population and which protects us naturally.
The strains of viruses currently circulating have lost their virulence. The authorities will not be able to say that it is thanks to the containment because the downward trend had started even before its implementation.
The decline of the epidemic had even started, in some cities, before the introduction of the curfew.
Unfortunately, there are still deaths which occur in very old people, very obese people or people suffering from severe diabetes, severe high blood pressure, cardiorespiratory or kidney diseases which are already crippling. These people at risk are perfectly identified. Health measures should therefore be targeted to protect, detect and treat them as early as possible from the onset of symptoms with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, the efficacy and safety of which are widely confirmed, if the treatment is given. precociously.
Many deaths could have been avoided. However, general practitioners and geriatricians have been dissuaded from treating.
In this context, continuing to persecute our children behind unnecessary masks remains incomprehensible. All these measures are made so that the French demand a vaccine. So what is the benefit of a generalized vaccine for a disease whose mortality is close to 0.05%? No. This mass vaccination is unnecessary. In addition, the risks of vaccination may be greater than the benefits.
Most worrying is that many countries, including France, say they are ready to vaccinate in the coming weeks, while the development and evaluation of these products have been rushed and no results the efficacy or the dangerousness of these vaccines has not been published to date. We only had the right to press releases from industrial manufacturers, allowing their shares to soar on the stock market.
The worst part is that the first “vaccines” we are offered are not vaccines, but gene therapy products. We will inject nucleic acids that will cause the production of parts of the virus by our own cells. We absolutely do not know the consequences of this injection, because it is a first in humans. What if the cells of some "vaccinees" made too many viral elements, causing uncontrollable reactions in our body?
The first gene therapies will be with RNA, but there are projects with DNA. Normally, in our cells, the message is sent from DNA to RNA, but the reverse is possible in certain circumstances, especially since our human cells have since the dawn of time contain so-called "endogenous" retroviruses integrated into the DNA of our chromosomes. These "domesticated" retroviruses that inhabit us are usually harmless (unlike HIV, AIDS retrovirus for example), but they can produce an enzyme, reverse transcriptase, capable of transcribing backwards, from RNA to DNA. .
Thus an RNA foreign to our body and administered by injection could encode DNA, just as foreign, which can then integrate into our chromosomes.
There is therefore a real risk of transforming our genes permanently. There is also the possibility, by modifying the nucleic acids of our eggs or sperm, to transmit these genetic modifications to our children. The people who promote these gene therapies, falsely called “vaccines” are sorcerer's apprentices and take the French and more generally the citizens of the world, for guinea pigs.
We do not want to become, like tomatoes or transgenic corn, GMOs (genetically modified organisms). A medical official from one of the manufacturing pharmaceutical companies said a few days ago that he hoped for an effect of individual protection, but that one should not hope too much for an impact on the transmission of the virus, therefore on the dynamics of the 'epidemic. This is a disguised admission that it is not a vaccine. A shame.
I am all the more horrified that I have always been in favor of vaccines and that I have chaired for years the bodies that formulate vaccine policy.
Today, we must say stop to this extremely worrying plan. Louis Pasteur must be turning in his grave.
Science, medical ethics and above all common sense must take over.